SingaporeBy the standards of Defence a $1.8 million 12 month contract with Deloitte is just a blip but it’s illustrative of money being sprayed around. We also have a quick look at AIR 6500 – and maybe what the DSR had in mind was something completely different from what I originally thought.

Maybe the hint they are giving is to look at expanding LAND 19 Phase 7 and adding on the David’s Sling missile from Israel. We have a look at some false claims and exaggerations from Defence and ask can’t we do better when it comes to the local manufacture of guided weapons. Finally – who invented the printing press?  You might be very surprised by the answer – and it has implications for improving Australia’s security.

To listen to the podcast, click here.

APDR_Bulletin_728X90


For Editorial Inquiries Contact:
Editor Kym Bergmann at kym.bergmann@venturamedia.net

For Advertising Inquiries Contact:
Director of Sales Graham Joss at graham.joss@venturamedia.net

Previous articleAsked and answered: China’s strategy of political warfare
Next articlePalo Alto Networks adds to Australia and New Zealand business teams
Kym Bergmann
Kym Bergmann is the editor for Asia Pacific Defence Reporter (APDR) and Defence Review Asia (DRA). He has more than 25 years of experience in journalism and the defence industry. After graduating with honours from the Australian National University, he joined Capital 7 television, holding several positions including foreign news editor and chief political correspondent. During that time he also wrote for Business Review Weekly, undertaking analysis of various defence matters.After two years on the staff of a federal minister, he moved to the defence industry and held senior positions in several companies, including Blohm+Voss, Thales, Celsius and Saab. In 1997 he was one of two Australians selected for the Thomson CSF 'Preparation for Senior Management' MBA course. He has also worked as a consultant for a number of companies including Raytheon, Tenix and others. He has served on the boards of Thomson Sintra Pacific and Saab Pacific.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Hi Kym,

    Another good podcast. As for your conversation regarding the potential for furthering our relationship with the ROK, I am wondering what do you see as the most obvious or suitable areas for military or industrial co-operation? My current thinking is that Australia should acquire at least 3 more Destroyers serving the air warfare role. This could be Navantia’s offer for 2nd block of Hobart’s or perhaps an Australianised version (9LV and All Mk41 VLS) of ROK’s AEGIS destroyers.

    • Thanks. South Korean defence industry now does fairly much everything. It’s slightly depressing to think they started developing the sector at the same time as Australia in the mid-1980s with a similar budget and with the aggressive initial use of offsets and a sustained government policy of achieving self reliance they now make things from main battle tanks, ships, submarines, the KF-21 supersonic fighter through to satellites – so there’s a lot to chose from. Their Arleigh Burke derivative the KDX-111, which is about the same size as the Hunter class, packs 80VLS cells compared with 32. I think it’s worth having a look at that. It’s too late now but rather than spending $3 billion on refurbished M1A2s it would have been interesting to get a price on new K2 Black Panthers – even though I’m agnostic about the entire MBT issue. At some point we are going to have to look at some form of submarine capability as the chances of ever receiving second hand Virginia class fades – and again the KSS-111 Batch 2 is about the most modern and affordable design around. We are in the hunt for a new jet trainer / light attack aircraft and the FA/50A seems to tick all of those boxes and it will be interesting to see how our USAF-obsessed air force handles that competition.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here