The December 8 decision of Australia not to send officials to the Winter Olympic Games in China is no surprise following an identical announcement by the US. Beijing has reacted with predictable anger – though logically it should be pleased because this means there will be far fewer freeloaders attending but the athletes will still be there. However, symbolism is important and we will have to wait and see what retribution, if any, is coming our way.
Only two weeks previously Defence Minister Peter Dutton speaking at the National Press Club warned that China’s aggressive and expansionist policies are causing alarm not just in this region but around the world. Central to this is the issue of Taiwan and whether Australia should be involved more actively in the defence of the island in the face of Beijing’s on-again off-again threats to use force to reunify it with the mainland. This debate, in turn, was prompted by earlier remarks from former Prime Minister Paul Keating that Australia has no vital strategic interest regarding the future of Taiwan.
This is an extremely complex topic and at the risk of oversimplification, the position of Minister Dutton seems to be that if China invaded Taiwan then the US would certainly come to its defence and it is considered highly likely that Japan would also be drawn in. If this happened, should Australia also become involved? The answer from the Minister was an indirect yes, indicating that it would be in our national interest to do so for several reasons. These include the belief that China would not stop there but the Senkaku Islands – currently administered by Japan – would be next.
This is an excerpt from APDR. To read the full story, click here.
For Editorial Inquiries Contact:
Editor Kym Bergmann at [email protected]
For Advertising Inquiries Contact:
Director of Sales Graham Joss at [email protected]
