Asia Pacific Defence Reporter
Home › Govt Policy & News

VIEWPOINT: The madness continues – $30 billion for the partial construction of three SSNs in Adelaide

By Kym Bergmann

•Feb 15, 2026
VIEWPOINT: The madness continues – $30 billion for the partial construction of three SSNs in Adelaide

Today, PM Anthony Albanese and South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskus have announced the initial spend of $3.9 billion out of a total investment of $30 billion to build nuclear-powered submarines at Osborn. This is for a state-of-the-art production hall adjacent to existing infrastructure at the yard. Australia – and the RAN – have stated repeatedly that the plan is to operate a maximum of eight SSNs.  The first part of the plan is to buy up to five Virginia class submarines from the United States – the first two of them being about 15 years old – and with deliveries starting in the early to mid 2030s. If the US part of the deal goes through, that means that the $30 billion Osborn facility will be building a maximum of three British-designed SSN AUKUS boats.  Even then, each submarine will only be partially constructed in Australia because the central reactor compartment involving some of the most complex engineering work will be fully imported from the UK. Should the US not be in a position to sell five Virginia class submarines to us, why has Australia given billions of dollars to their submarine industry base, with more to go? Why are there no refund clauses for these gigantic cash handouts – with the UK also being a recipient of a similar amount of cash. In the longer term, the Virginia subs will need to be replaced – everything runs out eventually – but the proposed SSN AUKUS, if it ever eventuates, will be a 10,000 tonne behemoth unsuited for the shallow conditions that are found in many parts of our region. Crewing them will also be a major headache – and should they ever eventuate they will have been overtaken by huge numbers of uncrewed AI-enabled submersibles. On the face of it, the announcement about the Osborn yard investment looks like a huge waste of taxpayer dollars. Surely the time has come for an independent review into the entire AUKUS Pillar One deal. For Editorial Inquiries Contact: Editor Kym Bergmann at [email protected] For Advertising Inquiries Contact: Group Sales Director Simon Hadfield at [email protected]

TAGSAUKUSKym Bergmann
Kym Bergmann
Kym Bergmannhttps://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/

Kym Bergmann has more than 35 years of experience in journalism and Australian and international defence industry. After graduating with Honors from the Australian National University, he joined Capital 7 television, holding several positions including foreign news editor and chief political correspondent.

After 2 years on the staff of a Federal Minister, he moved to the defence sector and held senior positions in several companies, including Blohm+Voss, Thales, Celsius and Saab. In 1997 he was one of 2 Australians selected for the Thomson CSF 'Preparation for Senior Management' MBA course, the other being Chris Jenkins - formerly the CEO of Thales Australia.

He has also worked as a consultant for a number of companies, including Raytheon, Tenix (now part of BAES) and Martin Marrietta (now part of Lockheed Martin). He had several board appointments, including Thomson Sintra Pacific (1994 - 96) and Saab Pacific (1998 - 2003).

He retains good personal links with senior figures in Government, as well as in industry and the media. He decided to return to journalism in May 2008, and holds the position of editor for Asia Pacific Defence Reporter (APDR) and Defence Review Asia (DRA). He is also a podcaster and commentator on defence and national security issues.

Comments

Loading comments...

Leave a Reply