https://3d.markforged.com/x7fe_cs_whitepaper_.html?mfa=apdrThe view from Beijing is slightly different, with the narrative that the G-7 and to a lesser extent NATO are continuing a campaign of persecuting China.  While China can continue to question the motives of the West following the summits of the last fortnight, what is beyond doubt is that an increasing number of countries are starting to resist perceived aggression in domains such as commerce, foreign policy, cyber security and hard power force projection.  The big question is whether these strengthening positions make armed conflict more or less likely.

The problem for Beijing is that President Xi’s preferred “wolf warrior” style of diplomacy – an in your face, we couldn’t care less about what you say – coupled with actions during the last decade is leaving China relatively friendless on the international stage.  An obvious exception to this is Russia among nations with serious military clout – but that country is a shadow of its former self when it was the heart and soul of the USSR 30 years ago.  The other nations that could be placed in the pro-China camp are a collection of outcasts, such as Iran, or much of sub-Saharan Africa, whose economies are closely coupled with that of their gigantic trading partner.

The current more assertive attitude towards China is being led by the new Biden administration, which has made it clear that a tougher line is needed – and that was reflected at the G-7 meeting.  For the moment, several European powers are hedging their bets with France and Germany hoping that it is still possible to find some middle ground.  NATO is in a similar position and even though Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg mentioned China in a communique as a possible competitor for the time it remains unclear if all 24 member countries share identical views.  However, it is noteworthy that even some of Europe’s smaller countries are getting sick and tired of Beijing’s belligerence: https://thediplomat.com/2021/03/lithuanias-outreach-to-taiwan-is-another-blow-to-chinas-europe-diplomacy/

China has an absolute right to self-defence – and in addition many actions that have taken place can be seen as a natural rebalancing of the international order to better reflect economic and therefore military strength.  China also suffered from a 150 year period of humiliation at the hands of the West and Japan that has only recently concluded. Having said that, in attempting some sort of rebalance, Beijing might have gone too far and misread the overall international situation.

The first major move at pushing the boundaries was the claim to ownership of the South China Sea and the island-building campaign that accompanied it.  The US in particular was distracted by events in the Middle East, firstly with Afghanistan but secondly and more importantly with the invasion of Iraq in 2003.  Countries in the region most directly effected by China’s territorial claims – Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia – were too small and isolated to risk a serious and sustained military conflict.  Perhaps the lack of an international response resulted in further miscalculations – the treatment of the Uighurs, suppression of democracy in Hong Kong and repeated displays of military aggression against Taiwan.

Immediately prior to the public spasms of rage regarding the outcome of the G-7 and NATO meetings, President Xi appeared to make a sharp U-turn in the overall tone of diplomatic rhetoric, telling senior Communist Party members on June 2 that China needed to be seen as more lovable to cultivate more friends on the international scene.  It is to be hoped that in the coming months Beijing will again try and steer a course far less aggressive and threatening than that of the last five years in particular.  Even a country as large, powerful and historically important as China might realise that having the entire world against you is not a productive place to be.

USE THIS ONE


For Editorial Inquiries Contact:
Editor Kym Bergmann at kym.bergmann@venturamedia.net

For Advertising Inquiries Contact:
Director of Sales Graham Joss at graham.joss@venturamedia.net

Previous articleFrom the Magazine: DEFENCE BUDGET 2021-22: TOP 30 SUSTAINMENT PROJECTS
Next articleSoldier On recognises World Fuel Services Australia as Platinum Pledge partner
Kym Bergmann
Kym Bergmann is the editor for Asia Pacific Defence Reporter (APDR) and Defence Review Asia (DRA). He has more than 25 years of experience in journalism and the defence industry. After graduating with honours from the Australian National University, he joined Capital 7 television, holding several positions including foreign news editor and chief political correspondent. During that time he also wrote for Business Review Weekly, undertaking analysis of various defence matters.After two years on the staff of a federal minister, he moved to the defence industry and held senior positions in several companies, including Blohm+Voss, Thales, Celsius and Saab. In 1997 he was one of two Australians selected for the Thomson CSF 'Preparation for Senior Management' MBA course. He has also worked as a consultant for a number of companies including Raytheon, Tenix and others. He has served on the boards of Thomson Sintra Pacific and Saab Pacific.

1 COMMENT

  1. APDR is always a highly professional Military magazine. Good analyses and reporting have been done through the years. BZ Editor and staff. Keep up the good work. Your reader, Adrian Villanueva (former mobilised Naval VR officer “Confrontation” 1963-66, and SAF-MID pioneer Intel officer (1966-1971), Regional Biz/Negotiation Consultant and 20+ years Adjunct Lecturer for RMIT, Curtin & Newcastle Universities for BA & MBA programs and 2 Chinese universities Guangzhou & Macau. Presently, semi-retired Negotiation & Mediation Consultant, Advill Consultancy (Singapore) and writer/author.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here